28 October, 2008

A king Leer

I'll amidt that I'm rading Candy girl for....is the word salicious? - reasons. I have weighed in on strippers before: I have been to a strip club once and have enjoyed the 5 bachelor parties that i have been @. But I'm not that into strippes, or whatever...
...except that I AM. The very idea that a women takes her clothes off and danses around for the enjoyment of men has struck that complex alchemical combonations I call my ....um..... interests..... and I think that it is kool. Again- i've been to a strip club once - but the very idea....is..... exciting. it's like when I was a senior in university, and I had a promiscious friend that takled openly of having sex w/ guys, and this young man was blown away, scandalized, and ..........deeply intrigued.
So - Back then thought it was .... alluring and fascinating that a woman took off her clothes and did things w/ guys
So -now, i think is it ... alluring and fascinating that a women takes off her clothes and danses in front of guys......
I know it's the power thing, and whatever, I blame it on your society or whatever (Actually, I guess I kinda celebrate and thank god that it was this society that 'twisted me so much').
So - here is Diablo Cody's account of her year in stripping. Can baerly put it down. I haven't finished it, but my LURID fascination kept me turning the pages until I realised I HAD TO SLEEP. Not the biggest fan of Juno, but am a fan of this book. Read on a free Saturday, It would taken 3-4h. But I got home so late and was so busy today.
It'll be done soon.

Parrot Cage

Very late to celebrate our anniversary on time, we finally did something we always wanted to do - and celebrated our anniversary (22 July, y'all-woman - thank yr god yr not my girlfriend, seriously) @ the same time. We went to teh Parrot cage, a resturaunt that is located on thr grounds of the South Shore Country Club. Yes, hilts actually shelled out for a full priced meal (no 2-1's)- although w/ tip clocking up to be $65 total, it wasn't all that much.
Parrot Cage is a resturaunt run by kennedy King College's cooking school, and it has a nice rep. It's housed in an old country club rite on the lake's southeast shore. I 1987, Sister.1 had her reception there. My only golf game ever - well, 3 rounds - was there. And we had a kick ass time. She got some pasta, while I got a steak. I will freely amidt that I was a bit intimidated- people were dressed up and it was like a real restuarunt, and. well, sometimes, i feel out of place. However, a few minutes in, and i was fine. She had more than a great time.
And I ended up giving her some Wright books - she dug them - when I had some expensive jewlery to give her. She was stoked about the books - but now I gotta figger out some other nice dinner place to give her the better stuff.

24 October, 2008

38D

written by lazers

names edited by hilts


It was one of those nights for which I thought Benkowski would have to split J&B into two teams just so there would be two teams to play trivia. I can only assume the regular TC Pub crowd was still nursing its hangovers after a rowdy night of watching game one of the World Series the night before. Or not. Nevertheless, Benkowski managed to scrounge together four teams to start trivia. By the start of the second half, we were up to five.

J&B represented by: Chemical Man, Stix, Vaughn and Lazers

The competition: Bar, Irish, Seventeen and, added at the half, Fab Five

Championship rules with each team allowed 3 throws and 1 Hangman. Unannounced, the Hangman option became “Lady’s Choice” instead.

First Half: Sports/90s TV/Name the Megahit Artist

For the music category, teams had the option to sing 10 seconds of the song instead.

‘86- sang “View to a Kill”?
’81- sang “Don’t Stop Believin’”?
Last year the Bears played in the NFL West?
’81- this NFC team won its division with a 9-7 record?
Number of Gold Gloves won by Ozzie Guillen?
1970s- sang “Vehicle”?
On “King of Queens”- Doug and Carrie’s last name?
’93 White Sox primary RF?
’85 Bears won their division- which teams won the other two NFC divisions?
’82 Cubs manager?
Year Darryl Sutter was drafted by the Blackhawks?
1998-99 TV season- top 3 rated shows (1 drama, 2 sitcoms)?

“Lady’s Choice” sees Irish challenging J&B to a drinking contest with water. The Irish girl (there were two of them- they could create a formidable tag-team) quickly finishes her water and puts her cup in Benkowski’s hand. Vaughn, oblivious to the fact that the other girl had already won the contest, continues to down her water for another several seconds with an intense expression on her face. She finishes then nearly chokes on the last drops as she laughingly realizes the contest was long over.

Vaughn makes up for the humiliating “drink faster” result by defeating the Bar in a “Roll the Ball” challenge.

Scores at the half: J&B 1690 Bar 870 Seventeen 720 Irish 570

Second half: 80s Music/Ditka Era Bears/90s Emmy Awards

Soon, the “90s Emmy Awards” category was renamed “Mostly Emmy’s”

Only Bear to lead the team in catches 3 times in the Ditka era?
80s- solo artist sang “Oh Sherrie”?
The 2 Bears to lead the team in punt returns 3 times each in the Ditka era?
80s- sang “All I Need Is A Miracle”?
Who hired Mike Ditka to coach the Bears?

For that last question, Seventeen had control. Their main guy (or should I say kid?) mumbled an answer (I think he was hoping his mumble was close enough to be accepted as “McCaskey”). Benkowski seeks clarification. The Seventeen kid answers “yo momma”. Benkowski: “I should subtract points. Wow- some pointless anger.”

In Vaughn’s third “Ladies Only” challenge of the night, she faces the new Fab Five in a “Long Distance Throw” contest. While Meat Loaf may think that “two out of three ain’t bad”, J&B thinks one out of three sucks. Fab Five wins.

Fab Five was a rather vocal team. Benkowski: “A rare night when the Bar isn’t the loudest team.” What? Hilts misses a couple of trivia nights and he is completely forgotten?

Fab Five “Lady’s Choice” against the Bar- largest chest. Or, as summed up by one of their vocal members: “Tit size”. Benkowski spends a few seconds analyzing the chests then decides to ask each gal their respective bra size. The Fab Five gal (who would have fit in nicely with Irish) defeats Theresa. For future reference, Theresa is 38D.

Scores after two halves: J&B 2440 Bar 2170 Irish 1330 Seventeen 940 Fab 720

Choice of Final Category: 80s Entertainment, Chicago Locations, Current Chicago Bulls, or 2008 Tampa Bay Rays.

J&B is tempted by the Rays, skeptical of Locations without Pat, and wary that “Entertainment” really means “Obscure Benkowski Stories”. J&B selects 80s Entertainment and wagers the classic (1901).

Nobody selects the Bulls or Rays questions.

80s Entertainment:
On “Dallas” she played the one who shot J.R.?
2-word title- movie about softball players that featured much female nudity?
WGN radio guy who squealed to CBS radio about Benkowski, costing him a part-time job?

Locations:
6200 W 63rd- what town?
Jackson and Oak Park Avenue- what town?
7600 W Touhy- what town?

Home players?
Part II

J&B guesses Mary Crosby, Stealing Home, and Chuck Swirsky. The team is certain only about its first answer.

First half answers:
Duran Duran
Journey
1966
Tampa Bay
1 Gold Glove
Ides of March
Hefernan
Ellis Burks
LA Rams and Dallas Cowboys
Lee Elia
1978
ER, Friends and Frasier

Second half answers:
Walter Payton
Steve Perry
Dennis McKinnon and Jeff Fisher
Mike and the Mechanics
George Halas

Final Question:

Fab Five- 720- Locations- guesses Bedford Park (no), Oak Park (yes), and Des Plaines (no)- wagered 719- left with only 1.

Seventeen- 940- Locations- guesses Summit (no), Oak Park (yes), and Chicago (yes)- wagered 940- up to 1880.

Irish- 1330- Entertainment- guesses Sue Ellen (no), Porky’s Revenge (no), and Harry Caray (no)- wagered it all- thanks for playing.

Bar- 2170- Entertainment- guesses Victoria Principal (no), Naked Softball (no), and Rich King (no)- wagered it all- thanks for playing.

J&B will need to win its wager to enjoy victory tonight.

J&B- 2440- Entertainment- guesses Mary Crosby (yes), Stealing Home (no), and Chuck Swirsky (no)- wagered 1901- left with 539.

Tonight’s champion: Seventeen. That’s right- Seventeen. The team that guessed “Cheers” for every single Emmy question, even those looking for a drama, won the trivia competition. Somewhere in Las Vegas, some Sportsbook just took a beating on long-shot bets.

Entertainment answers: Mary Crosby, Squeeze Play, and Dave Ennitt.
Location answers: Chicago, Oak Park, and Chicago.

So, what did squealer Ennitt snitch about to get Benkowski fired? At the time, Benkowski was involved in management at Sportsphone. He hated this position- he much preferred to be out at the ballparks. So Benkowski is in his Sportsphone office while he also is supposed to be providing live updates from a Cubs game. He turned the radio on loudly in the background for his CBS updates so that it would sound like he was at the game. Then Dave Ennitt sold him out. If Ennitt ever turns up with his tongue cut out, now we know why.

As for “Squeeze Play” (1980)- A male softball team is challenged by a female softball team to see who is best.

I do not recognize a single name from the cast, although I know of director Lloyd Kaufman as the man who later directed “The Toxic Avenger”. Perhaps the movie is best summed up by this line from the one and only reader comment on IMDb: Obviously this movie sounds a bit tired, but the scene where the guy catches the ball with his butt is hysterical, and the surprise ending when the girls aren't even annoyed seems a bit unrealistic, but who cares?

Damn- I would have hoped for a realistic ending for a movie during which a guy catches a ball with his butt.

Next trivia night in two weeks: Thursday, November 6th. Early indications are that Lazers is “in”.
J'aime faire que le sexe

21 October, 2008

Matthew

A favoured story of mine happened on the bus from downtown back to my neighbourhood. I'm sure I wrote about it it here, but again -

Empty bus, late nite, me, an old guy, maybe two others, silent bus....... and then the voice, in that clipped "rock radio commercial reader " voice:


"Rocking Radio V 106 - the Home of the Hits!!"

Strange, just some guy fucking off......


Seven minutes later, same voice, same local, same saying


"Rocking Radio V 106 - the Home of the Hits!!"


Strange, but i realised we had a jibberer on board. Seven minutes later...


"Rocking Radio V 106 - the Home of the Hits!!"


By now, like Ahab waiting for that deeply regular sounding of the sperm whale, I knew that in a about, say, seven minutes, this guy would spout out again and I would be able to chuckle to myself .....so I waited...... and waited..... and then........again he sounded with his "Rocking Radio V 106 - the Home of the Hits!!" , and again I chuckled, and again ten years later I wrote about it......


So, finally I saw Pasolini's 1964 "Gospel of Matthew". I liked it a lot. A real lot. Not that I will go out and crucify myself or whatever, but I have it on loan still and maybe will re watch it before I have to return it. I'm not sure that I could recommend it for everyone - there is no context, words are shouted forth quickly sometimes - but it has lots to recommend. Roger does as well.


Well, first there is the gospel. Partly @ this point, I wish to read or experience the gospels a lot in a rote memorization sorta way. Having the Gospels always around for me helps when I try to argue w/ those.....you know, the evil ones..... It helps to have the material @ ones fingertips/brain tips, etc... The photography was excellent - I liked the stark black and white. The acting - done mainly by non actors and the fact that the script was the bible opened to Matthew was kool as hell. I noticed not everything was actually in order, but it was great. Jesus was kool - barking @ the camera.


And then there was the music. Old baroque classical stuff, some pop jazz blues....and a deeply infectious song which to ths minute I canna get out of my head. Internetted up finally on this day - a few after I'd seen the film - I find that my mystery song is a 'traditional african drumming' or something. It was an African song - think of a group of kids singing, and a kool beat on the drum. When Jesus was convieved and born, this song rocked out. Joyous, wondrous, great - if you've seen the movie, I hope you'll remember. Then, when jesus cured the leper - again it was played.


So, as I sat there, hioping for this wonderous song would come on again. It was played @ three occasions - the conceptio , the birth, and now a miricle. As I sat there, i knew if i waited long enough, that yes, there woould be a playing of the song again: See, I've read matthew, and rememeber that it ends, basically, with a Resurrection.


"Rocking Radio V 106 - the Home of the Hits!!"

Sunday, as Langersdorf, after the River Plate,

Saturday nite cooks

Made people happy w/ my limited cooking skills this extended weekend. On Thursday, I did it up for Mom. Turkey burgers. Then on saturday, it was Gf and Mom for Pork chops. I can make poeple a little happy for some moments, sometimes.

18 October, 2008

thank god for the designated driver

drunken night @ the rainbo w/ gf and dragon...... just too much drinx - in this case, it was four... paid for it mightlty, well, rite now...... was there last Sunday w/ Goodkixx and Jacob, and Kenny was the tender - here again he was last night - and it was his artwork on display.... he does quilting, and every 15m or so the art displays @ Rainbo feature his work....... over the years -it's been what, almost 20y since I've been going there - artists get about a month up on the walls of the bar - there's been lots of great stuff put up over the years.... Joker asked what's the 411 o getting some of his stuff up - he's got some great stuff built up over the years, although his artistry these days has drawn away from what most peole typically call art....anyway, i'm still sick, but am gonna take some calls from a particular friend - matthew - and you know who matt is ... and that will unsicken me.............
Rainbo was packed, and it was a good night....many artistic things flipped through my mind - a treatment og one of the gospels - yes, i know The Gospel of MAtthew's been done - but maybe Luke, w/ guess who as Jesus (like you gotta guers), a return to an opera culled from _____ songs and dedicated to _____ .......well, lets wait on that (Blackie was the original hoped for collaborator, now....?) , and others......
we'llsee

17 October, 2008

Ahab

Not a good sign when I'm yelling @ the kids, tossing them form class, laminating pictures of Ahab so I can wear them constantly. Sometimes.......... Not a good day @ all.

16 October, 2008

Bully Pulpit




Notice from Rocky:


Hello,

This is to alert you to the attached full-color flyer which informs you that a band I play in will be
performing a mere two weeks from tonight In the City of Chicago. Which is nearby.

we don’t play out very often at all
and our guitarist is a total dervish
and our bassist an igneous rock
and our drummer a polymath
so it should be most excellent

Weds Oct 29th
9:30pm sharp.


The Elbo Room:
2871 N Lincoln AveChicago, IL 60657(773) 549-5549
$7 (yeesh. I know, I know. But the club dictated the cover charge…)

Migratory season

It's been a cool week or so of birdwatching. For the first time as a birder, I have seen a flock of crows - have seen 2-3 @ a time, but this was a ragged flight of 7-8. Families tend to be 3 or 4, so a flock it was. I see these birds all the time -well, a few of them - around Brother Rice HS, so they are the Br. Rice flock from now on. Crows are just about my favourite birds. Good birds.

I have noticed a lot of Hawks as well. I read in the Trib today about the Hawk watch, and it clicked - that's why there have been so mnay of them in the area. I'll float the idea of going here w/ Gf. And later a picture of a hawk I saw @ the fire game last week. giant bird.

15 October, 2008

From the Ehrman

Christ died for our sins.
Justified by faith.
Ever hear these phrases? So have I -and I have never understood these terms - even rejected them. @ two score and two, this dude, who praises Jesus, is a church goer, receives communion and reads the Bible, could never understand the concept. But I’m pretty sure I’ve added this understanding to my belt - and, generally, well, I don’t wanna say I reject the concept - but it is somewhat unsatisfactory.

Here’s the concept, from the Ehrman, taken from his “Great Lectures” lecture on the New Testament. It’s from St. Paul - who never was a follower of Christ when he was alive, but had a miraculous vision of the resurrected Christ after Jesus’ crucifixition. St. Paul is a very interesting figure. He, a very proud pharasitic Jew, was actually a total persecutor of the early Christians. However, as recounted - in several different variations in the Acts and his letters that are contained in the New Testament - he encountered Jesus on the road the Damascus. Jesus had been crucified some time before, and this encounter with the risen Jesus changed St. Paul's life forever. This changed man was probably the most important person in the history of Christianity’s growth - beside, y’know, Christ.

There are several concepts that are important to understand before the explanation flows. One is that St. Paul’s ’acquaintance’ w/ Jesus was of the risen Christ. To St. Paul, this fact was paramount -that it was the RISEN and RESSURECTED Christ - once dead, but now back to life. The concept of “Christ died for our sins” and “ Justified by faith” are null and void w/ out St. Paul running into the risen Jesus - had St. Paul known him during his life, this concept wouldn’t have occurred.

A second important concept is the Jewish Law - covered yesterday here. St. Paul, deeply versed in the Hebrew Bible (The Old Testement, y’all) and a very observant Jew - had believed (pre meeting Jesus on the road) that in order to have a right standing before God, one must keep the Law. One is, to use the words, justified by the Law.

The third important concept was an odd phrase somewhere in the Old Testament along the lines of “Cursed is anyone who hangs from a tree”. St. Paul took this to mean the crucified Jesus. However, as St. Paul believed that of all people Jesus could not be cursed by God,- indeed, God showered his favour on Christ (He was risen from the dead, after all…) that meant that Jesus’s death on the cross could be no accident or miscarriage of justice. Indeed, it must have been planned.

So - Jesus - not cursed, as he was the one person more than anyone who was ultimately blessed by God. Since He, as Gods blessed one, could not borne the curse (“Cursed is anyone who hangs from a tree”) for anything HE could have done, he must have borne it for others. Therefore, Jesus’ death must have been a sacrifice for others sins and not his own sins.

From this comes the concept:

A persons sins can be forgiven if one accepts the sacrifice Jesus paid by faith - that one must trust in Jesus’ death for salvation. It is Jesus’ death and resurrection - and nothing else - that makes a person have a right standing before God. Therefore, keeping the Jewish Law cannot be the way to achieve a right standing before God - only accepting Jesus death as a sacrifice for you sins can.

Got that? Yeah, I’m still working with it too.

In earlier years, I reacted to people saying that ‘Christ died for your sins’ by saying that I didn’t want some dude horribly tortured and murdered to have anything to do with my multiple sins. I’m hopelessly a Roman Catholic - so when Christ said to love your enemies or love your neighbours as yourself - these concepts meant much more to me than some weird idea stemming from “Cursed is anyone who hangs from a tree” as the meaning of life. loving your enemies seems a much much much more pertinent concept.

Right?

14 October, 2008

The Law

Say - long time ago, seeing the demise of Jacob (nee Jamie) under the rotted tutelage/tyranny/dictatorship of Der fuhrer, Vito and I were wishing -on one of those non-Ithaca phone calls from several years ago - that the two of them could be sat down w/ a real biblical scholar to shift through Der fuhrers funny claims.

Well - after a year on the job, I AM THAT SCHOLAR NOW. I finally got the breakthrough that kinda runs riot through that guys jibbering. It involved the Jewish Law.

So - what is the Jewish Law? By my understanding, early in the Old Testament there are a massive series of various laws that Jews have to keep. They are legion- here is a sampling from a quick wiki search from just one of the books -Leviticus:

Laws concerning idolatry, the slaughter of animals, dead animals, and the consumption of blood (Leviticus 17)
Laws concerning sexual conduct - incest, bestiality, and most notably
homosexuality among men, laws concerning sorcery, and moloch (Leviticus 18, and also Leviticus 20, in which penalties are given)
Laws concerning molten gods, peace-offerings, scraps of the
harvest, fraud, the deaf, blind, elderly, and poor, poisoning the well, hate, sex with slaves, self harm, shaving, prostitution, sabbaths, sorcery, familiars, strangers, and just weights and measure (Leviticus 19)
Laws concerning priestly conduct, and prohibitions against the disabled, ill, and superfluously blemished, from becoming priests, or becoming sacrifices, for descendants of Aaron, and animals, respectively (Leviticus 21-22)
Laws concerning the observation of the annual feasts, and the sabbath, (Leviticus 23)
Laws concerning the altar of incense (Leviticus 24:1-9)
The case law lesson of a blasphemer being stoned to death, and other applications of the death penalty (Leviticus 24:10-23), including anyone having "a familiar ghost or spirit", a child insulting its parents (Leviticus 20), and a special case for prostitution (burning them alive) (Leviticus 21)
Laws concerning the Sabbath,
Jubilee years and slavery., (Leviticus 25).
A hortatory conclusion to the section, giving promises regarding obedience to these commandments, and warnings and threats for those that might disobey them, including sending wild animals to devour their children. (Leviticus 26:22)


That's just a very small sample. It goes on and on. Here are some of different ones listed out - watch it!! The point is, when one talks about "The Law" in the Bible - and Jesus talks a lot about it, as does St. Paul - this is what they are talking about - the Laws that one had to live by to be considered holy. It is not the Roman laws of the time, or the laws of gravity, or the laws of soccer. Those who lead their lives by the LETTER of the law but were not really living by THE SPIRIT OF THE LAW were considered hypocrites by Jesus. Again and again, jesus says that the Laws were made for man, and not man for the Law. So, it is against the Law to WORK on the Sabbath. However, some of his disciples were hungry, and when they were walking through a wheat field, some of them ate a bit of the wheat tops. When the "Holy" ones saw this, they said that they were sinning because they worked on the Sabbath. Jesus said, basically - Dudes - my boys were hungry, and we had to eat - the Law was made for man......"

So, after Jesus was killed, St. Paul became one of the major Christian missionaries. However, he found especially fruitful pickings in the gentiles - the Non jews. These non Jews who wanted to become Christians never lived under the Law, and they rally didn't want to. However, some backward looking Christians - Jacob, Jesus brother was among them - were making these gentiles convert to Judaism before they were allowed to become Christians. This meant - YIKKKKKKES _ that they had to be circumcised (as well as not hang w/ their family, etc etc etc - lots of ruff stiff). St. Paul was like "What the fuck? They shouldn't have to become Jews first to become Christians finally. If one wants to be a Christian, one neededt need to love under the Law." There was a huge debate, then, among the two schools of thought before a compromise was reached @ the Council of Jeresulem . No cutting, thank God.

So - the Law, as written about by Paul - is a very easily understood concept. VERY EASY. And unfortunately for Der Feurher, he misunderstood what was being said . And double misfortune - he has based his WHOLE WORLD VIEW ON THIS LAUGHABLE MISUNDERSTANDING. He takes The Law to be the laws of the state, or the rules of the road, or whatever - he takes it that Jesus came to rescue us from the Law, he thinks that we can go killing and raping and murdering and cheating and all of that - because, well, that is what the Law is to him.

It'll take a long time to convince university trained Jacob - trained under Marvin Rosen, no less - of this little misunderstanding - but Der Feurhers whole worldview is contained here - so I'm imagining the wars to come over Jacobs soul in the days to come.

Der Feurher is a very sick dude - well, slow, or whatever - and we do feel sorry for him. But Not so sorry to try to rescue my boy from that paralyzed thought process.

....................................................

I have run this before, but here are some of the funny Laws - which have you broken, and what was yer punishment??:

Dear President Bush,

Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I have learned a great deal from you and understand why you would propose and support a constitutional amendment banning same sex marriage. As you said "in the eyes of God marriage is based between a man a woman." I try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination. End of debate. I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some other elements of God's Laws and how to follow them.

1. Leviticus 25:44 states that I may possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?

2. I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her? (I'm pretty sure she's a virgin).

3. When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord - Lev.1:9. The problem is, my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?

4. I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2. clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself, or should I ask the police to do it?

5. A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an abomination - Lev. 11:10, it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this? Aren't there 'degrees' of abomination?

6. Lev.21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle-room here?

7. Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev. 19:27. How should they die?

8. I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?

9. My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev.19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? Lev.24:10-16. Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair, like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)

I know you have studied these things extensively and thus enjoy considerable expertise in such matters, so I am confident you can help. Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and unchanging. It must be really great to be on such close terms with God and his son, ... even better than you and your own Dad, eh?

J. Kent Ashcroft (and others).

half finished movies finished

Cinema severals seen (last two weeks, mainly)

Been watching a lot of movies lately - some half seen several weeks before, several on dvd, and the balance in the cinema itself. These are just two so far.



Ahab, Magnificant


The two ‘finishes’ are “Moby Dick” and “The future is unwritten”. Y must remember my large Moby kick from the summer; when school started I checked out some of the literary books (think Cliffs notes, although that was not one of them) from our library. The book = great, though their was some turgid parts. . I’d seen ½ of the movie in, say, early September w/ Gf and Mom, but both were bored w/ it a bit and so I didn’t force them to watch the rest. It was nice to see the movie, but boy it paled next to the book However, it gives me an opp. to write a bit more about the book.

Most of the book Moby Dick was a long prologue to the final face-off w/ the White Whale. It includes stretches where Ahab becomes more and more crazy. However, when finally the ultimate showdown occurs - it took several days for the whole showdown to go down, and a couple face-offs betwixt the humans and the whale- Ahab has his last little heroic art before the end. In the movie, there is that last glorious effort - Ahab the old man, mounting the whale’s back and trying to kill it, jamming the knife into the whale - kool. And then the one scene I remember -burned into me - from watching Moby Dick on WGN’s Sunday Classics from when I was six or seven or whatever and has lived w/ me since - of Ahab, dead, tied to the side of the white whale. It always stuck into my mind -maybe a fear of drowning, of being caught by something and being dragged below the waves……. Now, 30y later, the scene wasn’t so shocking - no longer the power to disturb my young mind.

But the best moments of those showdowns @ the end of the BOOK ranked the movie. Again, there was Ahab, in the in the second of the long three days fight between Ahab and the Pequod versus the White Whale, adrift on the waves after his small oared boat (not the larger Pequod, the sailing vessel) was smithereen’d to pieces by the white whale. He- adrift in the open waters made raging by the whale -proved a man to the end. Treading water amidst the wreckage of the smaller destroyed boats , notices that the white whale - just done trashing the small boats - is starting one of his whirlpools to try to drag down the other sailors adrift in the raging waters. But there is Ahab, rising on a swell, shouting to the Pequod to …..what ? The waters drown out the commands….but then a last swell raises him above just for an instant, and he is able to yell out instructions that saved the ship.

This is that passage:

“Meantime, from the beginning all this had been described from the ships mastheads; and squaring her yards, she had born down upon the scene; and was now so nigh, that Ahab in the water hailed her:- “Sail on the” -but that moment a breaking sea dashed on him from Moby Dick, and whelmed him for the time. But struggling out of it again, and chancing to rise on a towering crest, he shouted,- “Sail on the whale!-Drive him off!”
(Ch CXXXIII)


There was still time.........

And then the final showdown - rite @ the end - Ahab, again in a small boat riding astride w/ the whale, harpoons into the whales hide, Ahab wildely desperate to kill the whale, and everything wrong. All falling apart, death is near, but I dearly love following Ahab’s actions. In the movie, the whale never gets hurt and seems invincible. In the book, it’s different - the whale actually spouts blood and it seems Ahab has a chance. In the end, there is Ahab, magnificent, athletically leaping about trying to fasten this or that part of lines from a harpoon thrust into the whale, working it to the end…….

Here now is this - to me - deeply stirring passage from the book:

“The harpoon was darted; the stricken whale flew forward: with igniting velocity the line ran through the groove; - ran foul. Ahab stooped to clear it: he did clear it: but the flying turn caught him around the neck, and voicelessly as Turkish mutes bowstring their victim, he was shot out of the boat, ere the crew knew he was gone. Next instant, the heavy eye-splice in the ropes final end flew out of the stark-empty tub, knocked down an oarsman, and smiting the sea, disappeared in its depths.”
(Ch. CXXXV)

I love it - read: it was the "stricken whale”. Again, there was a chance. Ahab, till the end, again, magnificent, dashing about trying to work it - but in the end, Tampa was just a better team than the Sox.

And, the book was better than the movie.

"I don't know what love is"


I also finished “The Future is Unwritten”, a bio of Joe Strummer. Gf and I’d seen the first hour @ few weeks ago @ the Shipleys, but had to leave before it finished. Finally finished, now. Again, it’s always kool to see the scene in the 1970’s, and it’s always refreshing to remember that fucking fresh breathe that punk rock was then. I love punk, and do believe it to be one of th highest of all forms of art. Why? Because everyone is an artist, and punk really spotlighted that. Can’t play the bass? Well, welcome to the Clash or the Pistols! These days, it mite read this way: Can’t play or act? Well, welcome to the stage of Klas and a 20m art performance piece on ….the battle of the Denmark Strait!

Punk rock, baby.

There wasn’t too much I didn’t know about the history of Strummer pre and during Clash, but it was good to hear of his later life. I’d forgotten the Pouges bit. And the music and shots backstage were fantastic - God do I love the power of “White Riot” and “Career Opportunities”. And the sad bit - that these super punkers - the only band that mattered - actually , uh, did start to ape , uh, the excesses of, say, the Rolling Stones in their later career. We all get old, rite?

There have been better films/bios of rock - that Beatles thing I loved was better - but I loved this and so will you.. The only thing I missed was that there was no mention of my favourite post Clash song - “Love Kills” from “Sid And Nancy” - an aces up song.

I remember when we learned of his death. Vito and I, doing the 7h drive from LA to OAK in Dec/Jan, were stranged to hear loads of “Sandinista” being played on some cali radio station. We were surprised that they were playing so much of it (it‘s a three LP album- 36 songs - and great), and then an hour in , the do told us the news. He was gone.

Next - two from the current cinemas

Friday nite in Vietnam ; Saturday in Chicago

Nice weekend. We went to a movie Friday nite, and we enjoyed it so much we did it again the next nite. We often do this - a movie one nite results in a movie the next. The last time we did this we went to Hulk and iron Man on successive days @ the LaGrange. This time it was “Tropic thunder” and “Eagle Eye”. We liked both.

Tropic Thunder!

We used a 2-1 for a Chinese restaurant in LaGrange Park. It was great - we’ll go back. We went to the downtown LaGrange Borders so I could quickly look and see if they had a Roman catholic New testament to carry about instead of the endless Protestant Gideon’s I collect….and carry around.

There was a guy with double telescopes rite outside he front door, and people were looking up @ the moon. So -was he just a geek w/ an interest in letting people see the moon, or hired by Borders?
Wait..........two telescopes?

Ah, I love audiences like this. Ebert - and Roeper, since he got into the big show - write a lot about the vibe in a theatre while watching a movie. “Tropic Thunder” ‘s aud. was my kinda vibe. The movie, I thought, was great. I’d heard that it wasn’t that good, but I yukked it up the whole time. From the opening, with it’s absolutely perfect takeoff on “Platoon” - God, we live in a world of genius - to the part near the end when I jumped out of my seat cheering and laughing (along w/ the rest of the crowd), it was a great ride. I like Ben Stiller a lot - and w/ Jack Black, Owen Wilson, and Tom Cruise - I shoulda known it would be good - but I’ve also seen “A Night at the Museum”, which was stunningly bad.


See it.


Eagle Eye!


On the spur, since Saturday was Gf’s and neice.3’s B-Day,- and two of the kids were home from University - I decided to pizza party it. Good turnout - 14 people, before the young ones split. I had it @ 5pm, so that the impatience youngsters couls go and do what they really wanted - hang out w/ frenz. There was five of eight represented.


I like big action Hollywood stuff, and this sorta mindless thriller was very good. Seems a lot of people liked it - the kids @ school were talking about it last week, kids going to see Monday, and then today one of the staff was talking about really liking it.


We liked it too. If you like big action type million miles an hour type deals……..see it.
I think I had a strong desire to have a drink after. Keegans.
The Goodwekend would continue for the next two days. But not me here now. To-morrow.

snaps...... a few, for now, more later...

so, offa mia assa, and some feeble snaps reprinted back in space and time

http://dachicagosports.blogspot.com/2008/09/manchester-and-madrid-in-chicago.html

http://securityout.blogspot.com/2008/09/my-bloody-valentine.html

http://securityout.blogspot.com/2008/09/totally-wired.html